Some of the content on this website requires JavaScript to be enabled in your web browser to function as intended. This includes, but is not limited to: Flash (also requires the Adobe Flash Player), navigation, video, image galleries, etc. While the website is still usable without JavaScript, it should be enabled to enjoy the full interactive experience.
Murder is the unjustified killing of a human being. Murder is the unjustified killing of a human being with malice or forethought.
True False
P could not be the holder of an easement over D's property because P's property is not contiguous with D's. P could not be the holder of an easement over D's property because an incorporeal hereditament lies only in grant.
John had no obligation to Mary unless it appeared that John's conduct would injure her. John owed Mary a duty of reasonable care only if he created a foreseeable risk to her. Both a and b. Neither a or b.
True False [Assume nothing based on the facts you were given. Prosecutor also has to prove that the shooting caused Mary's death.]
True False [Don't ignore facts. Negligence is unreasonable conduct. Facts say Mary was driving in a reasonable manner.]
True False [Common student errors. Last clear chance is Plaintiff's rebuttal to Defendant's defense of contributory negligence.]
P could not be the holder of an easement over D's property because P's property is not contiguous with D's. P could not be the holder of an easement over D's property because an incorporeal hereditament lies only in grant. [Overlooking the obvious. This phrase sounds like a legal term, but it's not. If a term is completely foreign to you, it's probably wrong.]
John had no obligation to Mary unless it appeared that John's conduct would injure her. John owed Mary a duty of reasonable care only if he created a foreseeable risk to her. Both a and b. [Answer a uses the familiar legal concept in Answer b in nontraditional words] Neither a or b.